WP6 DHQ

This topic contains 5 replies, has 6 voices, and was last updated by  Ulrike Paulus 4 days, 6 hours ago.

Viewing 6 posts - 1 through 6 (of 6 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #755

    Gaia
    Moderator

    Dear all,

    As discussed during the April 3 meeting, please provide your comments on the WP6 DHQ via this forum.

    Attachments:
    You must be logged in to view attached files.
    #770

    First time donors (blood):
    2.4 Have you had an uncomplicated infection? When/ever?

    Repeat donors (blood)
    1.2 Have you eaten and drunk today? (Donor education/empowerment)
    2.4 Have you had an uncomplicated infection since the last donation?
    3.2 Have you received cornea-, meninges- or other transplants since the last donation? Covered by 2.2
    3.3 Did you faint or feel sick after a donation or needle injection? Should be handeled as donor-education empowerment
    5.2 Have you had malaria since the last donation? Travelled in a malaria area?

    Best

    Morten Bagge/Denmark

    #778

    Piia Korkalainen
    Participant

    Dear all, please find attached Johanna’s and Piia’s proposal to the DHQ (for general and blood).

    Attachments:
    You must be logged in to view attached files.
    #786

    Sheila McLennan
    Participant

    Comments on first time donors – blood:
    2.2 – need to give time period (? ever) – fever and diarrhoea should not be in the same question as ever been hospitalised or had a serious illness
    2.4 – should be recent infection not uncomplicated
    2.14 – why is infection of the genital system specifically for plasma?
    3.1 – should ask this question for blood too
    3.3 and 3.4 – also for blood

    Best wishes,
    Sheila

    #787

    Sharon Zahra
    Participant

    Hello have made comments in the document itself on the version uploaded by Piia earlier – hope this helps – happy to discuss

    best wishes
    Sharon

    Attachments:
    You must be logged in to view attached files.
    #789

    Ulrike Paulus
    Participant

    Hi,
    have attached with additional comments in the draft that Piia and Sharon used – but it is getting increasingly difficult to work with all the tracked comments…
    My general thoughts:
    q2.2 – too much in one question, i would worry people can’t take it all in and answer accurately; i also think it is sometimes better to ask about symptoms rather than diagnoses such as “neurological disease”, “vascular disease”; medical lay people might struggle with some of the terminology and find it easier to answer questions about symptoms. I think this is particularly relevant when interviewing potentially traumatised bereaved family members of deceased donors, not sure they can process a range of diagnoses all in one question
    – think we need to ask about surgical history separately?
    q2.4 – infection – need to know when; even a serious infection if resolved is likely to be acceptable
    q2.14 – “infection of the genital (reproductive) system” – what exactly is being asked?
    Kind regards,
    Ulrike

    Attachments:
    You must be logged in to view attached files.
Viewing 6 posts - 1 through 6 (of 6 total)

You must be logged in to reply to this topic.

Login